The Supreme Court hears Section 230 arguments | The Vergecast



The Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Gonzalez v. Google, a case over whether YouTube’s recommendation algorithms …

source

This Post Has 12 Comments

  1. ZanderEast

    The fact of the matter is they ban people of a certain political view sometimes in a matter of hours. They have literally allowed them to use their platform for years, it’s on purpose.

  2. Sownheard

    The lawsuit is absolutely idiotic.

    YouTube is like a highway where everyone can post stuff and to pretend YouTube has to have a terrorist watch is just the government failing at there job's and trying to find a new scape goat.

    😂 No one would press the i am a terrorist button.

  3. Jack Martinelli

    You could blame anything for anything and take it to the supreme court. Everything and everybody influences everything. This is such nonsense.

  4. yanksrock1000

    Really interesting issues. Can’t say I fully trust our Supreme Court to understand the nuisances of the internet.

  5. Alan Miller

    There needs to be a "like" counter.

    Aren't you guys journalists? Speak like an adult.

    And then, like, literally, um, like….

  6. Flat Top

    You’re talking about the extreme’s, twitter,YouTube Facebook only uses it to their benefit they might allow one group on that they support but not another because it goes against their agenda. I think they should lose protection due to Business practices that they have shown in the past.

  7. tom swan

    By the way in the channel list you have uravgconsumer etc but don't have vergecast, maybe you should change that.

  8. Arthur Hamilton

    Considering that fb, YT, Twitter, Google willingly abused section 230 by discriminating against Trump, conservatives, Republicans in favor of the democrat party. So, that their party and candidates will win the elections. They all need hefty fines that is 1/2 of their value.

Leave a Reply